Shep, I think you just do this to suck me in, but what the hell.
QUOTE (cmshoot @ Mar 25 2007, 8:53)

Personally, I recommend the Rem700. There a reason why it's the #1 LE and military precision rifle in the US.
Yep, it's called status quo. "This is the way we've always done it."

Up until recently the government, the feds or state levels weren't too keen on getting their troops in harms way new equipment were they? How many LE agencies still required .38 revolvers until not too long ago? And how many still aren't allowed patrol rifles unless it's a pump gun?

Look how long it took to ditch the M1903's for that new fangled M1 Garand.

That combined with marketing, and the already substantial investment in materials, time, and training, and the fact they are indeed functional and accurate rifles once properly overhauled will keep them around and the standard for a long time.
But in the interest of full disclosure, If I had a building full of talented 2112's to build rifles for me to their high standards, hell, I'd use one too.

Remingtons are good rifles and they're popular, but they aren't the only game in town anymore, and that ole saw is a dog that just won't hunt. Despite what the media thinks, repeating something often enough does not make it true or relevent.

Honestly, until the advent of the Accutrigger rifles, I would have never even looked at buying a Savage. The folks running the old company made bad decisions and kept screwing stuff up. The cast receiver with integral scope mount comes to mind.

Their old triggers flat out sucked on most rifles and tuning them was a smith job to get safe results in most cases. The rear flat base for the scope mounts had a nasty tendency of being a bit off as well. The new receivers fixed that.
For a shooter living in modern times looking for a good rifle he doesn't have to put a metric butt ton of money into to get tuned and shooting well, or to have the barrel changed, It is damn hard to beat the Savage.